[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:29:00 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
The reason I implemented 'intangible' was for the sake of editing
forms. A form has fields to be edited, and fixed text that shouldn't
be changed. But there is no need to put point within the fixed text;
allowing that seems ugly.
'intangible' did not turn out to be a very good implementation
of this. Can anyone do a better job?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, (continued)
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, martin rudalics, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, martin rudalics, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/20
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, martin rudalics, 2015/03/20
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Yuri Khan, 2015/03/17
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/17
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/18