[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:09:19 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 10:33:35 -0400
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Karl Fogel and I wrote a modern
> > workflow (one which is used successfully by many many developers in
> > projects using DVCSes),
>
> Felicitations for them, but why should that be relevant to this issue.
> There is a reason why some people like that workflow, and a reason why
> it screwed me.
>
> you and Ken'ichi screamed, Eli rewrote it to
> > look like CVS.
>
> Thank you, Eli.
You are welcome. But Stephen's version of history is far from what
really happened. In particular, the CVS-like workflow was written by
Óscar Fuentes, not myself. And the other workflow, the one written by
Karl and Stephen, suggested a bound branch from the get-go, AFAIR
(although I cannot prove that now, since the Wiki didn't keep the old
versions, and even the Wayback machine only has those instructions
since about a year after they were first published).
- Re: VC mode and git, (continued)
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Steinar Bang, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/31
Re: VC mode and git, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/24