[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Sergey Organov |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:40:58 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> It's for Alan to say if it's more helpful than saying that a merge is
> "just a commit".
You are putting words into (my?) mouth. Nobody ever said that merge, the
operation, is just a commit, AFAIR. If you indeed meant me, that's what
I said:
After true merge operation is finished, the only result of it is
single commit appended to your current branch. Git /is/ that
simple. All the possible complexity is in the stage of content
preparation for this commit.
I fail to see how this could be taken as saying that merge is just a
commit. What I wanted to tell /you/, not /Alan/, is that there is no any
hidden meta-information or other mysteries involved.
-- Sergey.
- Re: VC mode and git, (continued)
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/02
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/03
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/03
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/03
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/03
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/03
- Re: VC mode and git,
Sergey Organov <=
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/04
- Re: VC mode and git, Sergey Organov, 2015/04/06
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/03
- Re: VC mode and git, Steinar Bang, 2015/04/04
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/04
- Re: VC mode and git, martin rudalics, 2015/04/04
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/04
- Re: VC mode and git, martin rudalics, 2015/04/04
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/04
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/04