[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:24:17 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
>> has it been considered yet to simply support an optional
>>
>> ~/.emacs.d/pre-package-init.el
>
> Yes. I suggested this on a previous thread (before starting this one) and
> someone complained of yet another file affecting emacs behaviour. Then I
> suggested the streamlined version of that in the first email of this thread
> (having a file that delays initialization, but doesn't actually get
> evaluated), and the few responses I got still preferred the other
> option.
My preference would be to add a post-package-init.el thereby not
changing the defined semantics of the current system at all.
Nic
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, (continued)
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Ted Zlatanov, 2015/04/18
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2015/04/18
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2015/04/18
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/18
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/18
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2015/04/18
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/18
RE: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Drew Adams, 2015/04/18