[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches

From: Ted Zlatanov
Subject: Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:38:55 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:54:17 +0100 address@hidden (Phillip Lord) wrote: 

PL> Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>> Some people use "scratch/", which seems sensible to me. (But there's
>> also one "fix/" and one "feature/" ...)

PL> "fix" and "feature" are after gitflow, which is how they got there, but
PL> I think "scratch" was the final decision.

PL> The fix/ branch was me; as it's going to take me a long time to finish,
PL> I've removed it.

I've removed one `feature' branch too. Please let us know what other
existing branches don't match the conventions so we can remove or rename


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]