|Subject:||Re: [Emacs-diffs] seq-let c856843: New macro seq-let, providing destructuring support to seq.el|
|Date:||Fri, 1 May 2015 22:42:02 +0300|
Wouldn't that be for a difference usage? If not, can you provide an
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> New macro seq-let, providing destructuring support to seq.el
> How 'bout adding support for `seq' to pcase instead?
> I.e. add a (seq ...) pattern to pcase.
> You can do that with `pcase-defmacro'.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|