[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] seq-let c856843: New macro seq-let, providing destruct
Re: [Emacs-diffs] seq-let c856843: New macro seq-let, providing destructuring support to seq.el
Fri, 01 May 2015 23:35:46 +0200
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> Wouldn't that be for a difference usage? If not, can you provide an
> You could use it as in
> (pcase-let (((seq a b) [1 2 3]))
> (message "%s %s" a b))
> which could return "1 2", tho that depends how you'd define the (seq
> ...) pattern, obviously.
I see, it would indeed makes sense to have it. I'll have a look at how
pcase works internally and how patterns can be defined.
I think having both would make sense though as `seq-let' is IMO simpler
to use. Maybe one could reuse code from the other.
Description: PGP signature