[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: etags completion table

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: etags completion table
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 00:00:35 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

>> I see the first patch says that it takes 1.34s to build the obarray and
>> 0.78s to build an equivalent list of strings, so we could change the
>> code so as to keep the completion table as a pre-built list of strings
>> instead of a pre-built obarray.  It will also save us a bit of memory.
> Maybe. The difference isn't much, though, and it's a one-time thing.

Agreed.  But the current use of an obarray is just wrong: it makes the
code use more CPU and memory resources for no benefit.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]