[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Aug 2015 11:02:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I suppose. Originally, I discarded this kind of idea as too hacky, but
> indeed, there's value in limiting ourselves to .dir-locals.el here.
> To continue this line of thought, would you say the variables should have
> global meaning (meaning all project backends should honor them), or should
> they be only used in the VC project backend?
Why choose: add a project method to get the variables (and make it use
hack-dir-local-variables by default).
Stefan
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, (continued)
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, João Távora, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, João Távora, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/07
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/08/05