[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: seq-some-p and nil

From: John Mastro
Subject: Re: seq-some-p and nil
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:35:19 -0700

Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> wrote:
> Agreed, and that's not the only case.
> Both `seq-some-p' and `seq-contains-p' are named as predicates but do
> not behave as predicates.

I think `seq-some-p' (or its successor) would also be more useful if it
promised to return the first matching element (the docstring says "any
element", though in practice it does return the first).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]