[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: seq-some-p and nil

From: Drew Adams
Subject: RE: seq-some-p and nil
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:46:40 -0700 (PDT)

> > Why make callers of `seq-some' deal with the nil-value-vs-not-found
> > issue and...
> There's no such issue with seq-some.  It only affects seq-find.

Oh, right, because you have not done what Nico proposed wrt returning
the element.  Fair enough.

The second part of what I wrote, which you elided, still applies:

Why make callers of `seq-some' ... wrap existing predicates they want
to reuse with cruft, just to get the desired effect?  Why not just
have `seq-some' DTRT, always?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]