[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Nix |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:29:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On 24 Oct 2015, Eli Zaretskii outgrape:
>> From: Nix <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>,
>> Przemysław Wojnowski
>> <address@hidden>,
>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
>> address@hidden
>> Emacs: The Awakening
>> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:17:10 +0100
>>
>> Raw TAGS files are more or less unsuitable for anything but C and Lisp,
>> and are pretty poor even for that (e.g. you can only jump from uses to
>> definitions, the definition can only be in one place...)
>
> Raw TAGS files are not supposed to be used for anything but
> definitions.
>
> For references, you are supposed to use ID-Utils or something similar,
> which use a different format of their DB.
Two different tools, for more or less identical jobs except that one is
one->many and the other is many->one? (In particular, the hard part
isn't the data structure, but the parsing.)
That strikes me as really, really ugly.
--
NULL && (void)
- Is EDE only intended to be used with languages which /require/ a 'compile' step? [was: Re: IDE], (continued)
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/15
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Tom, 2015/10/12
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE,
Nix <=
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/25
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24