[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:06:47 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
>I share this sentiment. I love most of the electricity and it should be
>on by default IMHO.
>
>But the change to C-o is for the worse. It should be "dumb" also at
>columns greater than zero.
FWIW, sometimes I want that, as you and David do, and sometimes I don't. It
just depends on what I'm trying to do. IMHO there's not an always-right answer
in the non-column-zero case.
Did you see Artur's post [1] giving an example of how the non-dumb behavior can
make sense in the non-column-zero case? I found it pretty persuasive.
(Whereas in column zero, I *always* want the "dumb" behavior, 100% of the time
-- and it seems that at least is a point of agreement for most people here.)
Best regards,
-Karl
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-11/msg01100.html
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
Karl Fogel <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Yuri Khan, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Yuri Khan, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12