[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?

From: Drew Adams
Subject: RE: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:01:39 -0800 (PST)

> >> And evidently, the desire to remove it means we think its
> >> binding outside Isearch is more useful.
> >
> > We do?  How and when did we decide that?
> >
> > What were the arguments pro and con - where can I find the
> > discussion? Did we poll the users, to get their take on this?
> You can find the discussion that you missed in the mail archive.

Could you possibly please point to it?

Subject? month? year? keywords?  I searched quickly (and unsuccessfully) for 
"capitalize" over the last 8 years, but
a pointer would help.

> > And that I disagree with.  But if it _has_ been discussed and
> > decided then I have no problem supporting the decision, even
> > if I disagree with it.
> I remember that the consensus was to reduce the number of
> Isearch keys that override their global bindings.

A consensus, huh?  And these particular keys were discussed,
and decided on?  I'd like to see that discussion.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]