[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lisp watchpoints

From: Noam Postavsky
Subject: Re: Lisp watchpoints
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 09:12:34 -0500

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Isn't the FUNCTIONP test needed for basically the same reason as using
>> CONSP over !NILP? i.e. to avoid segfault in case of (put <var>
>> 'watchers '([1])).
> Ffuncall does all necessary checks.

It would signal in case of error right? Currently the code is ignoring
bad watcher elements (including out of range integers), but perhaps
it's actually better to signal an error.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]