[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Making `interactive' conditional

From: Drew Adams
Subject: RE: Making `interactive' conditional
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 03:48:27 -0800 (PST)

> In any case, this discussion is not about changing the default M-x,
> but about experimenting with a new M-x, probably offered as a GNU
> ELPA package.

That's good.  Thanks for clarifying that.

So we can keep that in mind from now on: Unless stated otherwise,
when we write `M-x' in this discussion we really mean an
experimental new, alternate `M-x'-like command.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]