[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters

From: Philipp Stephani
Subject: Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:31:00 +0000

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> schrieb am So., 6. März 2016 um 21:05 Uhr:
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:16:37 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> This is probably for practical purposes (no point in showing thousands of "CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-xyz"
> completions). For a character escape these considerations don't apply, and it would be very surprising and
> confusing to not accept all characters.

The only characters that ucs-names omits are CJK ideographs, whose
codepoints can be computed from the name algorithmically.  All the
others are non-characters, right?  So why it won't be a good idea to
simply use ucs-names?

I've attached another patch to switch to ucs-names.

Attachment: 0004-Use-ucs-names.patch
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]