|
From: | Andreas Röhler |
Subject: | Re: Emacs 25.0.04: Feature Request: Make called-interactively-p's argument optional |
Date: | Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:36:56 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 |
On 30.06.2016 17:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Robert Weiner <address@hidden> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:25:26 -0400 Cc: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>, emacs-devel <address@hidden> It would be nice if John and Eli could just make some final decision on the interactive-p issue and then put that one to rest, whatever it is.I have no opinion on the subject, except the general principle that we shouldn't back up on past decisions unless they are truly disastrous,
They are. This is another example from a couple of issues which went wrong last years.
Code was made swollen up and complicated, simple solutions rejected.BTW a characteristic design-flaw beyond mentioned last days is around use-region-p.
With use-empty-active-region or region-active-p it hardly comes to an end.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |