[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
|
From: |
John Wiegley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
|
Date: |
Fri, 07 Oct 2016 10:07:59 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) |
>>>>> "LB" == Lars Brinkhoff <address@hidden> writes:
LB> Now that we have new maintainers, I'd be curious to hear if they have any
LB> thoughs on this? (See the original post for more information.)
No particular thoughts from me right now. I'm curious to see what happens with
Guile, but I'm not eager to change. It would be nice to have real compilation
of Emacs Lisp after the manner of Common Lisp, and maybe the concurrency
support; but otherwise Emacs Lisp works pretty well for our use cases.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Kelvin White, 2016/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Søren Pilgård, 2016/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Toon Claes, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, John Wiegley, 2016/10/09
- Re: Concurrency, again (was: Emacs Lisp's future), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/10
- Re: Concurrency, again, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/10
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, raman, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/12