[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:08:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.0.50.1 |
On 2016-10-11, at 15:33, Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Bottom line: I don't see much use for proper namespaces :)
>>
>> That's only true to some extent. Both names and nameless packages (even
>> though I really appreciate them) are really prosthetics; I'd have to
>> check it, but how do they behave with tools like xref-find-definitions,
>> edebug, lispy and others? I'm pretty sure that names won't cooperate
>> with them nicely (I vaguely remember trying, though I'm not sure), I'd
>> have to check nameless.
>
> I never used names. Nameless works entirely fine with all of the tools you
> mentioned, because it only touches font-locking.
Cool to hear that. I guess I'll have to start using it.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, raman, 2016/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Kelvin White, 2016/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Søren Pilgård, 2016/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, John Wiegley, 2016/10/07