[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again)
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:30:31 -0400 |
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:04:15 -0400 Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
wrote:
> > Wayland is on the horizon for Linux.
>
> Is Wayland tied specifically to Linux?
Wayland is sort of an X successor based on much more modern
principles. It will run on other free operating systems as well as
GNU/Linux.
> X doesn't have an infinite
> > life ahead of it, it dates from the 1980s and the free OS world
> > is working to move past it (thus Wayland). I suspect that simply
> > adopting Webkit (which is LGPL already) directly will probably
> > fix most potential portability problems, since the Webkit
> > people have to support whatever is used on most platforms
> > already.
>
> That seems plausible to me -- provided you really meant "GNU/Linux"
> in the first line.
I did.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), (continued)
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Philippe Vaucher, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/21
- Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/21
- Re: Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/21
- Re: Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/21
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again),
Perry E. Metzger <=
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Paul Eggert, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, joakim, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, SAKURAI Masashi, 2016/10/15
- Re: Concurrency, again, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/18