[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:03:57 +0200

> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:38:41 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>
> > I always have several frames in my sessions, each one with its buffer,
> > and when I restore the sessions, each frame comes up with the same
> > buffer it had when I shut down Emacs, no complicated frame-walking
> > dance necessary, neither before shutting down Emacs nor after
> > restarting it.
> Something similar happens when I use the defaults.  But the buffers come
> up in the "wrong" frames (i.e. associated with a different <fn> key),
> making it not useful for me.

Then perhaps the problem is that the frame names are jumbled after
restoring them, something that "normal" usage will never reveal, as
most people don't care about the internal numbering of frames, and I
don't think there was a requirement to keep them when restoring.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]