|
| From: | Clément Pit-Claudel |
| Subject: | Re: If records are not sequences, why does aref work on records? |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:00:39 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 2017-04-07 16:49, Drew Adams wrote: > I don't understand the backward-compatibility argument. > A record type has not existed before. When/where do we > already have `aref'/`copy-sequence' being applied to > something other than a sequence/array? Aren't record types used by cl-defstruct now?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |