Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden
> schrieb am Sa., 13. Mai 2017 um 19:05 Uhr:
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 16:44:08 +0200
> Cc: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Instead of a lambda, create a new type containing all data required to
> call the function, and support it in the evaluator. Because this type
> now also needs to store the function documentation, it is too big for
> Lisp_Misc; use a pseudovector instead. That also has the nice benefit
> that we don't have to add special support to the garbage collector.
> +#ifdef HAVE_MODULES
> + else if (MODULE_FUNCTIONP (fun))
> + doc = XMODULE_FUNCTION (fun)->documentation;
I wonder whether it would be cleaner to have MODULE_FUNCTIONP defined
even when HAVE_MODULES is not: it looks like it could save us quite a
> -DEFUN ("internal--module-call", Finternal_module_call, Sinternal_module_call, 1, MANY, 0,
> - doc: /* Internal function to call a module function.
> -ENVOBJ is a save pointer to a module_fun_env structure.
> -ARGLIST is a list of arguments passed to SUBRPTR.
> -usage: (module-call ENVOBJ &rest ARGLIST) */)
> - (ptrdiff_t nargs, Lisp_Object *arglist)
> +funcall_module (const struct Lisp_Module_Function *const envptr,
> + ptrdiff_t nargs, Lisp_Object *arglist)
I don't think we can simply remove a function that was already present
in one or more Emacs releases. We need to provide a backward
compatibility layer, and definitely also mention this in NEWS.
This is purely internal, and we can change implementation details at will. I've added a NEWS entry, though.