[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Native line numbers landed on master
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Native line numbers landed on master |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:07:47 +0300 |
> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:29:22 +0200
>
> > If you indeed mean continuation lines, I'd like to hear from others
> > what they think about this use case. Displaying the empty fields in a
> > face different from the number itself is some work, but I will do it
> > if that's the "popular demand".
>
> I can live with it, it just looks a little jarring when there are
> continuation lines.
OTOH, you immediately see very clearly where the current physical line
ends.
Anyway, I will wait for additional opinions.
Btw, if I were to do this, what other face attributes would you expect
to see removed from the empty fields, in addition to background color?
Or do you simply want them to be displayed using the line-number face
instead? (That could be a different font size.)
Re: Native line numbers landed on master, Filipe Silva, 2017/07/10
Re: Native line numbers landed on master, Robert Pluim, 2017/07/11
Re: Native line numbers landed on master, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/11
Re: Native line numbers landed on master, Kaushal Modi, 2017/07/11
Re: Native line numbers landed on master, Yuri D'Elia, 2017/07/15