[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving GNU ELPA
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Improving GNU ELPA |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:26:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I was somehow under the impression that "subtree" packages were
> preferred, and "external" packages only recommended for big packages
> and maintainers who refused to use the subtree approach.
It's up to the package's maintainer to decide.
Stefan
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, (continued)
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/07/13
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/13
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA (was: Adding advisory notification for non-ELPA package.el downloads), Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/16
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/16
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/16
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/19
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18