[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving GNU ELPA
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Improving GNU ELPA |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:08:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Are those complicated workflows for "subtree" packages only?
>
> Yes (and only if you use a separate upstream).
>
>> Does using an "external" package avoid the problem?
>
> Yes,
Mostly.
With dash, I can push to elpa, but not to upstream. So, changes occuring
to dash on ELPA, have to be pulled onto a branch, turned into a PR for
dash.
If I could push to upstream, it would be simpler, but still require
merges.
Phil
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, (continued)
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA (was: Adding advisory notification for non-ELPA package.el downloads), Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/16
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/16
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/16
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA,
Phillip Lord <=
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/19
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18