[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flymake refactored
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Flymake refactored |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Oct 2017 16:44:31 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:04 -0400
>
> > Yes, that is the natural way. But should it go into the emacs-26 branch?
>
> I'll let Eli&John decide.
If it's just a Flymake back-end, and doesn't affect anything else
unless activated, I see no reason not to have it on the release
branch, assuming that its support in the version of Flymake on the
release branch is reasonably good.
Thanks.
- Re: Flymake refactored, (continued)
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/09
- [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/09