[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 06e452a 1/3: Allow Edebug's instrumentation to
Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 06e452a 1/3: Allow Edebug's instrumentation to be used for other purposes
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:02:12 +0000
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 00:13:24 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > address@hidden edebug-after-instrumentation-functions
> > +An abnormal hook run by Edebug after it instruments a form.
> > +Each function is called with one argument, a form which has
> > +just been instrumented by Edebug.
> This seems a bit awkward.
Why? How is it at all awkward?
> How 'bout something like the 100% untested patch below?
You don't say why you want to make the patch. It looks to me like you
want to replace a normal abnormal hook with a single function. This is
less flexible (unless one jumps through hoops). It is also
incompatible; it will break applications which use the existing
Why do you want to break these applications? What benefits will the
new single function scheme bring?
I'm against this incompatible change (which I don't fully understand).
[ .... ]
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).