[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi
Currently there is a ongoing discussion on
gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user
about the vulnerability of smime/pgp.
Which was published in
https://efail.de/efail-attack-paper.pdf
I am using, besides gnupg, s/mime in GNU emacs with gnus, using gpgsm
and epg.
Now in the documented listed above mutt is listed, which is text based,
as being vulnerable.
So I am wondering: am I save with the above setting, maybe I should
check my html settings in gnus?
Regards
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/15
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16