Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "Richard" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

   > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
   > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
   > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

   > If you allow a mail user agent to render HTML for you, you expose
   > yourself to various kinds of surveillance and swindles.  Now, it seems,
   > one of those might be a decryption exploit.

   > Does the exploit depend on Javascript code that the MUI will execute?

Not sure, will ask in the gnupg list. Would be a sort of irony if the
only save email reader (avoiding this sort of attack) were GNU Emacs
+gnus/rmail/vm.

Snowden should have told us this. :-D

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature