[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bignum branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: bignum branch |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:18:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> For example, (eql 0.0e+NaN -0.0e+NaN) now returns t
>> because the two NaNs have different signs; formerly it returned nil.
> Should this be the other way around ?
You mean it's (eql -0.0e+NaN 0.0e+NaN) which should return t?
Shouldn't `eql` be commutative?
Stefan "confusion is power"
- Re: bignum branch, (continued)
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: bignum branch, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Achim Gratz, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/18
- bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/19
- Re: bignum branch, Achim Gratz, 2018/07/20
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/20
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/20
- Re: bignum branch, Achim Gratz, 2018/07/22