[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finding the dump
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Finding the dump |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:27:52 -0800 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] |
> On Jan 27 2019, "Daniel Colascione" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> There's some confusion on this thread. argv[0] *is* reliable
>
> Nope. The caller can set argv[0] to any string. It is in not required
> to be related to the name of the executable in any way.
Sure, but such callers are holding it wrong. If you set argv[0] to some
random string unrelated to Emacs, you break startup. That's fine.
>> every system I've seen. Here's the algorithm: look at argv[0]: if it's
>> not
>> an absolute path, make it absolute by prepending the startup CWD.
>
> If the executable is found on $PATH then argv[0] is *not* relative to CWD.
In that case, argv[0] will be absolute.
- Re: Finding the dump, (continued)
- Re: Finding the dump, Andreas Schwab, 2019/01/26
- Re: Finding the dump, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Andreas Schwab, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Andreas Schwab, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Andreas Schwab, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Daniel Colascione, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Andreas Schwab, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Stefan Monnier, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: Finding the dump, Stefan Monnier, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Daniel Colascione, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Andreas Schwab, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Daniel Colascione, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Andreas Schwab, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Paul Eggert, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Daniel Colascione, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Paul Eggert, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Daniel Colascione, 2019/01/27
- Re: Finding the dump, Richard Stallman, 2019/01/28