[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why do we have xsignal?

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: Why do we have xsignal?
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:02:23 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 4/22/19 10:30 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> xsignal is exactly the same as Fsignal, is there any reason we need to keep 
> it?

The two names are present only for historical reasons; see Bug#24047. I
don't see any reason to keep xsignal other than inertia, and would favor
dropping xsignal and changing its callers to use Fsignal as this will
simplify the code.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]