[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Future release of emacs-26

From: Richard Copley
Subject: Re: Future release of emacs-26
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 22:28:17 +0100

On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 22:08, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> The signature checking has never worked anyway, though.

Maybe not for you, but it's supposed to work, and AFAIK it works for
many people.

Oh, sorry. I always assumed this was why package-check-signatures defaulted
to allow-unsigned.
> Will having a newer
> signature make a difference? If I rename my .emacs.d/ and run "emacs"
> (master),
> then "M-x package-list", I get this:
> Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig:
> Bad signature from 474F05837FBDEF9B GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) <
> address@hidden>
> Command output:
> gpg: Signature made 05/14/19 10:10:03 GMT Summer Time
> gpg:                using DSA key CA442C00F91774F17F59D9B0474F05837FBDEF9B
> gpg: BAD signature from "GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) <
> address@hidden>" [unknown]
> This is on Windows, with gpg 2.2.11 on the path.

Sounds like a bug.  Could you report it as such, so we can track it
(and hopefully fix it for 26.3)?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]