Re: string-to-multibyte and string-make-*byte

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> No, I think when string-to-unibyte was de-obsoleted the other one just
> didn't come up, but I don't think there's a string objection.

Oh, OK, I'll unobsolete string-to-multibyte too, then.

> While I'm here, I'd suggest that we turn string-make-*byte into obsolete
> aliases for string-to-*byte (their specific behavior has always been
> heuristic in nature, and we changed `insert` to implicitly do
> string-to-*byte instead of string-make-*byte when needed, so it seems
> natural to do that).

Sounds good to me.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no