[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: evaluating numbers

From: Drew Adams
Subject: RE: evaluating numbers
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:30:47 -0800 (PST)

> > I don't see the default value there, but shouldn't it
> > be the value of (max-char)?
> >
> > If the point of printing the value as a character is
> > to print it as a character, why wouldn't the default
> > behavior be to print any possible character as a character?
> Please don't reopen old disputes.  The default is 127.

I didn't realize there was a "dispute", old or young.

I just came across this thread.  Tracing it back to
its beginning (which was only 5 days ago), I see that
the default is 127, and it was apparently previously
much bigger.  Too bad, but not a big deal.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]