[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: eintr.texi vs emacs-lisp-intro.texi

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: eintr.texi vs emacs-lisp-intro.texi
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 15:10:53 +0200
User-agent: K-9 Mail for Android

On December 30, 2019 2:42:36 PM GMT+02:00, Jean-Christophe Helary 
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The gnu site has this link for the "An Introduction to Programming in
> Emacs Lisp" source download:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/texi/eintr.texi.tar.gz
> from
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/eintr.html
> But the Savannah repository has the following file:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi

The  tar.gz file offered for download is just the contents of the doc/lispintro 
directory of the Emacs repository.  If you look inside the tarball, you will 
see the same emacs-lisp-intro.texi file there.

> emacs.texi and ack.texi also still refer to eintr.

The Info file produced from the Introduction is called eintr.info, and 
cross-references must use the actual name of the Info file.  So this is 
expected and perfectly OK.

> The HTML version of the Emacs manual has a link to "eintr.html" when
> the HTML file created by the "make docs" is emacs-lisp-intro.html
> It seems to me that there is an issue here...

Which of the above issues did you allude to?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]