[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: eintr.texi vs emacs-lisp-intro.texi

From: Jean-Christophe Helary
Subject: Re: eintr.texi vs emacs-lisp-intro.texi
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:22:35 +0900

> On 2019/12/30, at 22:10, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> On December 30, 2019 2:42:36 PM GMT+02:00, Jean-Christophe Helary 
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The gnu site has this link for the "An Introduction to Programming in
>> Emacs Lisp" source download:
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/texi/eintr.texi.tar.gz
>> from
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/eintr.html
>> But the Savannah repository has the following file:
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
> The  tar.gz file offered for download is just the contents of the 
> doc/lispintro directory of the Emacs repository.  If you look inside the 
> tarball, you will see the same emacs-lisp-intro.texi file there.

Thank you for clarifying. I should have checked myself.

>> emacs.texi and ack.texi also still refer to eintr.
> The Info file produced from the Introduction is called eintr.info, and 
> cross-references must use the actual name of the Info file.  So this is 
> expected and perfectly OK.


>> The HTML version of the Emacs manual has a link to "eintr.html" when
>> the HTML file created by the "make docs" is emacs-lisp-intro.html
>> It seems to me that there is an issue here...
> Which of the above issues did you allude to?

The one concerning the html version.

Jean-Christophe Helary
http://mac4translators.blogspot.com @brandelune

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]