[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Technically correct or conceptually easier?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Technically correct or conceptually easier? |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Apr 2020 21:24:20 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Non-nil means disregard read-only status of buffers or characters.
It follows that nil means don't disregard that.
In general, if
> Non-nil means do X
then nil means do things the usual way, and t means do X instead of
the usual way.
This practice makes hundreds of doc strings more succinct. I don't
think that making them longer would be an improvement.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)