[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in E
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs) |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Apr 2020 15:04:02 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Andrea Corallo <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>> address@hidden, address@hidden
>> Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:14:45 +0000
>>
>> Be careful that -Og produce considerably slower code than -O2. For
>> instance if I'm not wrong it disable completely inlining that is one of
>> the most rewarding optimizations.
>
> Yes, I know. But the difference in performance between -Og and -O2
> cannot be 8- or 9-fold, it should be somewhere around 50% to 70%.
Mmmh I agree with you, one magnitude order sounds a bit too much, even
if we have a ton of small getter/setters that are usually inlined.
--
address@hidden
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), (continued)
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/01
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), 조성빈, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Yuan Fu, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/02
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/01
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Alan Mackenzie, 2020/04/04
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/04
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Andrea Corallo, 2020/04/04
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/04
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs),
Andrea Corallo <=
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Richard Copley, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Alan Mackenzie, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/04
Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Richard Copley, 2020/04/04