[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: evaluating numbers

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: evaluating numbers
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 22:34:55 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > Those space considerations are no longer significant.  But there may
  > > be another problem: whether there is room in the representation of
  > > Lisp_Object for another type.

  > We do know the answer to this question, since XEmacs has had a separate
  > character type since even before it was renamed to XEmacs.
  > Basically: you make the room for it.

That would be an answer about the general design approach, but the
question I posed is about the current format of Lisp_Object.

Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]