|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] |
Date: | Tue, 19 May 2020 17:54:10 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 19.05.2020 17:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
In general, I'm intent on describing a pattern here: there's a very good reason for functionality that can be seen as infrastructure to be in the core.Definite 100% agreement. And I think this is a general tendency we should agree on regardless of the specific issues raised in this particular discussion.
We clearly have different ideas on what infrastructure is.xref and project are infrastructure. completion-at-point-functions and flymake, and eldoc are infrastructure.
Infrastructure is extensible.Eglot is some infrastructure and some implementation. And I'm still not sure what part of its "infrastructure" is generic enough to be used by other packages. Aside from jsonrpc, of course.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |