[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If undo-only why not a redo-only?

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: If undo-only why not a redo-only?
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 15:27:55 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

> The idea is to navigate only in one direction until the initial opposite
> action. or the other with the *-only commands, without the danger of
> switching unintentionally from undo to redo or vice-versa. If there is not
> more undo or redo or the next action is the opposite (redo/undo), just stop
> and do nothing (print a message maybe)

Yes, that's what `undo-only` and `undo-redo` attempt to provide, IIUC.
Have you bumped into problems with them?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]