[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If undo-only why not a redo-only?

From: João Távora
Subject: Re: If undo-only why not a redo-only?
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:01:06 +0100

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 22:19 Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> wrote:
Ohh, now I got it.

Sorry, but the name `undo-redo` was not clear for me at all 

Can't resist pointing out that that is quite  understandable. The "prefix-with-library" name convention is fraught with these little misunderstandings. It's arguably the last bad option we have now, but we would need a proper namespace system to fix them: renaming can only do so much.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]