[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:28:53 +0300 |
> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, self@gkayaalp.com, ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:17:03 +0000
>
> > Why does it have to be a command-line option (that isn't --eval)?
>
> I imagine myself in the condition of giving a suggestion to a colleague
> for trying out Emacs. It's very easy to suggest like '-m'. IMO it is
> already considerably more complex to start explaining --eval... or the
> .emacs equivalent. And I'm thinking to a colleague, if I think to
> someone less computer skilled it's even worst.
You don't need to explain anything, just create a .emacs file for them
with that one line. This is what I do in such cases. The advantage
is that the users don't need to remember any switches, and can invoke
Emacs from their desktop icons.
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: A modern-mode?, Noam Postavsky, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16