[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets
From: |
Akira Kyle |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:33:03 -0600 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 28.0.50 |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:06 PM, joakim@verona.se wrote:
Yes, I think that sounds more realistic than my original plan to
expose
the gobject api to lisp.
Thanks! I'm glad it's at least somewhat sane sounding.
BTW did you look at the widget that allows embedding of other
applications? I had some success embedding emacs inside emacs
using this
widget, and maybe it has evolved during the years.
I assume you're referring to the XEMBED protocol which I haven't
really looked at. I've actually been using the pgtk port [1] in
developing this to ensure I'm not tying myself to X as so much of
Emacs' display code has been as it evolved. Also there's some
rendering issue [2] with xwidgets under X which causes a lot of
flickering of the webkitgtk widget. I have yet to look into it,
but it doesn't seem to affect pgtk or ns.
[1] https://github.com/masm11/emacs
[2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41609
- Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Akira Kyle, 2020/10/12
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Stefan Monnier, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Akira Kyle, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Qiantan Hong, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Akira Kyle, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Qiantan Hong, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Akira Kyle, 2020/10/13
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/14