[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:02:46 +0000 |
Hello, Gregory.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 22:23:17 +0000, Gregory Heytings wrote:
> >>> The behaviour in Emacs 27 is chaotic. Sometimes a minibuffer moves
> >>> with a frame switch, sometimes it doesn't.
> >> I wouldn't write it is "chaotic". The behavior you consider "chaotic"
> >> is well-defined, and has been there since Emacs 21 at least: the
> >> minibuffer moves from frame F1 to frame F2 if and only if the
> >> minibuffer is active on frame F1 and a recursive minibuffer is entered
> >> on frame F2.
> > I'm not sure what you mean by "is" in that sentence.
> I've reread what I wrote five times, and I don't understand the question
> ;-)
It seems somewhat indefinite _when_ the recursive minibuffer "is"
entered on frame F2, relative to the other operations.
> >> There are other possible behaviors of course, but IMO the current one
> >> is a reasonable one.
> > If a recursive minibuffer operation has been carried out, then the
> > minibuffer moves, if it hasn't it doesn't. That means Emacs has some
> > invisible internal state, something which doesn't seem desirable.
> What do you mean?
In Emacs 27, emacs -Q, C-x 5 2, giving a two-frame setup. In F1, C-x b.
C-x 5 o, moving to F2. C-r SPACE. Note that the open minibuffer
remains on F1.
Now type C-x 8 RET SPACE RET. This sucks the open minibuffer over to
F2, despite the C-r operation having nothing to do with the suspended
operation in the minibuffer. This is not good and has been/is in the
process of being fixed for Emacs 28.
> By definition a recursive minibuffer is entered when a minibuffer has
> been entered and not yet left, that is, when the operation has not yet
> been completed. After typing C-x C-f in frame F1 and M-: in frame F2,
> the two minibuffers have been moved to frame F2.
More precisely, if we're talking about Emacs 28 with
minibuffer-follows-selected-frame at its default of t, the C-x C-f
minibuffer moves to F2 when F2 gets selected. The M-: then gives an
error message in F2, or (when enable-recursive-minibuffers is t) opens a
recursive minibuffer in F2.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, (continued)
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, martin rudalics, 2020/11/24
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, martin rudalics, 2020/11/24
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, martin rudalics, 2020/11/24
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/24
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, martin rudalics, 2020/11/24
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, martin rudalics, 2020/11/25
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Alan Mackenzie, 2020/11/25
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/25
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Alan Mackenzie, 2020/11/25
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/25
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Alan Mackenzie, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Alan Mackenzie, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, martin rudalics, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, martin rudalics, 2020/11/27
- Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/27