[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:52:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:
>> process-test-sentinel-wait-function-working-p which is used by
>> process-test-sentinel-sit-for looks racy. Just because the process
>> sentinel has been called is no guarantee that the process has exited
>> and had its process-status set correctly, perhaps it should loop on
>> 'process-live-p'
>
> AFAIK the only correct way to wait for a process to exit is (while
> (accept-process-output PROC)).
I vaguely remember that Stefan did propose (while (accept-process-output
PROC 0)).
Best regards, Michael.
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Robert Pluim, 2021/01/04
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Philipp Stephani, 2021/01/04
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e,
Michael Albinus <=
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Philipp Stephani, 2021/01/05
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Michael Albinus, 2021/01/06
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Philipp Stephani, 2021/01/17
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Michael Albinus, 2021/01/17
- Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Philipp Stephani, 2021/01/17
Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e, Robert Pluim, 2021/01/05