[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:43:10 +0200 |
> From: Christopher Miles <numbchild@gmail.com>
> CC: Christopher Miles <numbchild@gmail.com>, "sdl.web@gmail.com"
> <sdl.web@gmail.com>, "dgutov@yandex.ru" <dgutov@yandex.ru>,
> "stefan@marxist.se" <stefan@marxist.se>, "emacs-devel@gnu.org"
> <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 03:29:27 +0000
>
> I see, so can your point out which C code can be changed, which not. Then I
> have
> a clear view and guide. Otherwise, some developer have to guess whether this
> will disobey your principles.
I explained what IMO should be considered in such cases earlier in
this thread. It isn't really possible to point out which code can and
cannot be changed, because it depends on the nature of the changes and
the purpose/goal of the change, as I explained back then.
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, (continued)
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Christopher Miles, 2021/01/17
- RE: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Drew Adams, 2021/01/15
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Leo Liu, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Christopher Miles, 2021/01/17
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/17
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Christopher Miles, 2021/01/17
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/01/17